Wanna do all of mine for me? See how fun that is? I always liked darkroom for the control you couldnt get in a lab like custom cropping, but with RAw you have to do a lot of work just to open, and do basics like levels and sharpness that you got done for you at a lab with basic film processing with none of your labor or time. Shooting jpeg does not solve the problem either because the exposure latitude is nearly zero for really good results and that requires even more time to get just right than the RAW processing does.. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 10:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pixel peeping and looking for defects (was Re: Fullframelensesand the K10D, CA anyone?) Agreed. It's even more fun in some ways. No chemical odors wafting from the computer. Paul On Apr 14, 2007, at 10:42 AM, David Savage wrote: > Personally I always liked the darkroom aspect of photography. And the > digital equivalent is no different. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > > On 4/14/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Digital SLRS/photography is also a "pain in the ass" in >> some KEY ways. For good quality, you still have to "process" your RAW >> images. This is digital's "dirty little secret". I say its actually >> much easier to go shoot some color film, drop it off at a lab, and >> get nicely exposed, sharp prints. No, its >> not free like digital is, but if you actually value >> your time like your job, its probably as cheap or cheaper >> than shooting digital IF that's all you want >> or need. >> jco > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
