We're close, David. For that size image, I do 60%, 1 pixel, 11  
threshold.
Paul
On Apr 14, 2007, at 1:31 PM, David Savage wrote:

> Actually USM can be applied without viewing the image at 100%. I know
> from experience that a 800x536 @ 72 dpi web image, for example,
> requires USM settings ot 95%, 0.8 pixels, 10 threshold to suit my
> tastes. 9 times out of 10 these settings work perfectly, but I do get
> the occasional image that I have to go back and do manually.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
>
> On 4/15/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> UNSHARP MASK alone, which needs the image to be viewed
>> at 100% to set properly, cant be done with thumbnails
>> so there is no way to group them easily like you suggest
>> unless you open every file at full size which is a very
>> time consuming process I have grown to hate for an entire card.
>> jco
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On  
>> Behalf Of
>> David Savage
>> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 1:04 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Pixel peeping and looking for defects
>> (wasRe:Fullframelensesandthe K10D, CA anyone?)
>>
>>
>> The trick though, is not trying to batch process a whole card of  
>> shots
>> automatically (as you've said auto RAW conversion sucks) but to  
>> review
>> the shots, find groups of similar images and process those groups in
>> batches.
>>
>> Here's and a real world example of how I generally process my shots:
>>
>> <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/RAWWF_DS.jpg>
>>
>> Of the 40 frames, 4 are immediately disregarded due to general  
>> crapyness
>> or user error. I've identified 6 groups (32 frames) which I then  
>> process
>> in 6 batches. Leaving 4 shots that are individually processed.
>>
>> So instead of working on 36 pictures, I've in effect only  
>> processed 10.
>> Taking less than 5 minutes.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to