Oh yeah, my comments below were referring to the gull shot. I dont see any nasties at all on the pelican shot at all, even at 125% or 150% browser settings. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 6:25 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: A couple of K45-125 images hi, when I reduce the files to 1200 pixels wide, you can already see those jaggies on those edges even before the mild USM I then apply, which is only amount=25% radius=1, threshold=1, all done with PS CS. The larger image just before the resize doesnt show these jaggies nearly as much. Even so, when I view the final posted image in browser, its only about 3/4 the width of my 19" PC monitor seen in its entirety at 100%. At that magnification, these jaggies essentially disapper but can be seen again only if I set the browser for 125 or 150 magnification to blow up the image which I rarely do for web photos. jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mat Maessen Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 6:01 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: A couple of K45-125 images On 4/14/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://jchriso.com/temp/bocagull.jpg > > http://jchriso.com/temp/bocapelican.jpg The shots look good, but they're a bit oversharpened for my tastes. Most visible at the edge of the gull's feathers on the first shot, and the pelican's bill on the second. -Mat -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
