My original post on the topic was that with
digital photography you cant get as good
a results as you can with film with minimum
effort like you can with film. With digital
you have to do one of two things that are both
hard, either shoot and process RAW manually
or shoot jpeg VERY CAREFULY. Neither of these
are nearly as easy as shooting color neg film
and having it processed at decent lab. The reason
is film capture has great latitude , similar but
even better than RAW digital, yet lab printing
from film can be automated with great results,
UNLIKE RAW. 
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 9:28 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Pixel peeping and lookingfor
defects(wasRe:FullframelensesandtheK10D, CA anyone?)



> Huh, now your'e arguing MY point, and that is that
> digital photography requires a lot of processing
> that film photography doesnt. Its a big myth
> that digital is "instant" or "you dont have
> to get the images processed", you DO, and you
> have to do it YOURSELF, and it's very time consuming.
> Thats what sucks about it (currently).
> jco
>
        I'm not sure which side you're arguing for here.  If you want 
instant, shoot JPEG in the camera or find an automated batch conversion 
that works for you.  That's the same level of control as dropping film
off 
at the lab where a flunky getting minimum wage tosses it into the 
"Develop-O-Matic"

        If you want the fine level of control that manual RAW tweaking 
allows you to do on the low percentage of shots for which automatic 
doesn't work right, then be glad you have that capability.  I don't
think 
you're arguing for good processing, I think you're cursed with trying ot

get the BEST processing for everything (like I am).

-Cory

-- 

************************************************************************
*
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA
*
* Electrical Engineering
*
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
*
************************************************************************
*


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to