In a message dated 4/15/2007 11:27:39 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 15/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Heck, it's not even a title. It was a request for critique. There are >some aggressive young women out there lying in wait. Check out the >critiques here: >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628194&size=lg The complaint refers to 'Bridal Bootcamp' while your photo is (was) entitled 'Bridal Boot Camp'. There is a difference. What a load a bollocks! -- Cheers, Cotty =========== Sheesh, you're right. There is no trademark infringement (not that there was anyway), without exact spelling. Sometimes the world (or at least, the US) really seems to be against photographers. Marnie aka Doe ;-) ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
