David J Brooks wrote: > One thing i noticed, and not sure why, but the 16-45 on the K10D gives > a sharper image, on screen, that the istD. I have both cameras "zero'd > out". The 50-200 appears to give a slightly sharper image on the K10D > as well, but less noticeable then the 16-45. > > Still the images are not as sharp as the Nikon ones, "zero'd out".
What do you mean - "zero'ed out?" > Let me know how that diet works out. I'll buy it from you.LOL I probably should of bought a heavier tripod to burn off the pounds... >> Looking forward to a DA 600 f4 some day... :-) > > Aren't we all.:-) > It's funny and rather sad that the hall mark of Pentax used to be "tons of lenses available" - not only in the used market, but new as well. Well, hopefully that will turn around. - MCC -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mark Cassino Photography Kalamazoo, Michigan www.markcassino.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
