Hi, PEte - I just got back on list... as to this crop . Yikes - go back to the first one -
I agreed with Jack, though, it (number 1) seemed _too_ vivid be interesting to see a print of it or the original as you said you did up the saturation... I think the structure of the first one works much better - the cropped one looks, well...um, , cropped. ann P. J. Alling wrote: >In light of a couple of comments I decided to look back at my "proofs" >and see if there wasn't another shot. It doesn't address everyones >suggestions but the framing is different, I cropped it as an 8x10 and >the image involved less post processing which seems to be building up in >the way the water is rendered. Still the same relatively high >saturation. This was taken a few seconds after the first. > >http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_fishinatsunset2.html > >Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 800 % 1/3 sec. >smc Pentax 43mm f1.9 Limited @ f3.5 > >Notes: Hand held braced against stone pier IIRC. > >As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
