I had one declined with the comment; "Scan too soft". That was the only explanation of those declined. In that case, I'd sent two images of the same scene which were shot under different conditions. It may have been that they simply felt like explaining they're reason for having chosen the less dramatic of the two.(?) Really haven't logged the offered vs accepted ratio. Acceptance was high in the beginning, but has dropped of dramatically. It may be partially due to the high influx of offerings and they're QC method of slowing the train. Wouldn't doubt that there would come a time when offerings would be cut off, at least for awhile.
Jack --- cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got four images approved now but it's taken fourteen submissions > to get > there. Mind you, these are all images I see as keepers. I do > understand > though that it's pretty much a subjective grading system. It feels > good to > have one's images judged and approved but I'm trying not to get too > wrapped-up in it > > I'm just wondering what sort of in/out ratio you guys whit LOTS of > approved > images are seeing. > > I wish they'd put some quick comments in when they decline images. > Even > canned ones like "not sharp" or "too much noise" or even "Too Orange" > > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artist/galleryimages/gallery_image_175549.jpgCW > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
