David Savage wrote: >On 4/21/07, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Hi Dave >> >> > >G'day Brian, > >>Quoting David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>>At 11:07 AM 21/04/2007, Paul Stenquist wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I'm going to have to sign off for a while. I almost missed a >>>> >>>> >>>really >>> >>> >>>>important message from a potential employer today. >>>> >>>> >>>That's why I have dedicated email addresses just for the PDML. >>> >>> >>Me too - I couldn't cope otherwise. When I get too far behind I just dump >>the lot (sad, but necessary sometimes) and start again. >> >> >Ditto. So if I don't reply sometimes, I'm not being rude on purpose. > Me three.... I'm feeling bad that my post set the ball rolling on the last one, as innocuous as it seemed to me.
ann > > > >>>As always you can set up filters to block out the noise. >>> >>> > > > >>Can you? I can block certain email addresses (not that I have, yet) but I'm >>not sure that I'm able to block a specific thread. And it's been one thread >>that's caused the innundation of mail in the last couple of days. >> >> > >Sure. I use Eudora for one of my addresses as my email application. I >can set up filters that will search the address, subject line & >message body, either individually or all together, for defined content >(eg. aperture simulator, HDTV, a certain persons name etc) and any >offending message will be transferred to the bit bucket or a specified >folder. I can also set up similar filters at the server level via the >webmail interface. > >Gmails filters are just as easy to set up. > >Cheers, > >Dave > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
