Ok, but I think the quality or
lack thereof is independent
of performance optimization
at any paricular focussing distance,
and since this is a "portrait"
type lens, it probably is focus
optimized at a closer distance
than inifinity. My hunch is they
sacrificed the bokeh quality to make it physically
a VERY small optical/mechanical design.
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bob Rapp
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 8:32 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh - the photo


    I had seen them both. I think the key here is the focus distance.
Some 
lenses are formulated for medium or infinity focus. Other, macros for 
example, are formulated of close distance performance.
    Again, I compliment you on the f11 shot of the bottle brush.

Bob

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 9:48 AM
Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh - the photo


> If you look at the first bokeh test photo
> I posted shot at F2.0 from yesterday ,you will see the
> bokeh is not ordinary, its extraordinarily
> bad, kinda jagged double imaged looking. this second shot at F11 still

> shows some of that wierd double image/jaggedness but I probably
> should have posted them together so you
> could see/notice that in the second photo easier.
> I.
>
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Bob Rapp
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 7:32 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh - the photo
>
>
> I agree, the Boketh is ordinary. But no one commented on the shot. 
> Actually quite good. It looks like an Australian bottle brush flower. 
> I am sure it is
> not native to Florida.
>
> Bob
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to