Look everyone, Ann does not need a sign to make a photo interesting <GRIN!>
Need I say, I agree with Bob? Bob W wrote: > Some of those shots of Paris are really beautiful, Ann. > > -- > Bob > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of ann sanfedele >> Sent: 23 April 2007 22:50 >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: Just for the hell of it! >> >> Toine wrote: >> >>> Digital isn't better than film.It's a lot easier and in theory >>> cheaper. In fact thanks to digital I started shooting again. The > dark >>> room was a disaster and shooting color pos. or neg. was >> even worse. I >>> hated the long waiting and the ugly prints from the color lab. > Tried >>> PhotoCd and digital scanners which was a little more fun but very >>> expensive and time consuming. >>> Shooting RAW and inkjet printers is what I want! >>> So every picture I have shot the last years would not have >> made with film. >> Lots of shots I've taken I couldn't have gotten using digital - I >> couldn't have reacted soon enough... >> I also couldn't have gotten them with camera's that required >> batteries >> for anything but a light meter... >> I couldn't react fast enough... a KX or an LX (without the >> winder) and a >> 50mm lens , tri-x - shutter speed at >> 250, f8 and hyperfocal distance set - and the camera around my neck > >> requiring only that I lift the camera to >> my eye and click... >> >> This one is one that no matter how quick my reflexes were, the >> combination of having to turn on the camera >> and turn off the auto focus , etc... would have done me in, I think > - >> because I was shooting through the >> dirty window of a train - if I had to change the auto focus >> I normally >> use shooting digital to manual and turn >> on the camera I'd have been dead - well, or gotten a different > shot... >> also, there was much less to know about a manual camera - aperture, > >> shutter speed, focus, ISO, DOF view, quickly changed >> with visible knobs. >> >> http://tinyurl.com/2vqkx5 >> >> The main benefits of digital to me are >> >> no dark room chemicals to inhale or dispose of. >> being able to "chimp" (when one is taking pics of something >> one can do a >> quick do over on) >> and quickly get my ebay stuff photo'ed and on line. >> >> the lightness of the camera - my LX feels like I'm carrying workout >> weights when I lift it now. >> and the speed with which I can see results >> >> ann >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> On 4/23/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Ok, just for the hell of it. The general opinion here is >> that digital is >>>> better than film, so how about everyone posting a photo >> that they took >>>> with digital that they feel they could not, or would not, >> have done with >>>> film. >>>> >>>> -graywolf >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
