Scott Loveless wrote: > I've been thinking lately about the cost of doing photography and > finishing photographs for web publication. A recent, erm, thread got me > steamed up enough to post this. Basically, how much can you accomplish > without spending any more money than it cost you to obtain your > hardware? First some assumptions and then the rules. > >
I know this one is a bit old, but I just saw it while clearing out the inbox. http://urbanexperience.dyndns.org:18080/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=4970&g2_serialNumber=2 <http://urbanexperience.dyndns.org:18080/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=4970&g2_serialNumber=2> This was taken with a Toshiba PDR-M5 2.1MP P&S that never did focus correctly. Eventually I relegated it to "artsy-fartsy" duty, and did eventually snap off some good looking shots in the right environment. Post processing was only sharpening and cropping. Unfortunetly it's been 8 years since I took this photo, so I don't remember exactly what program I used, but I know I didn't have PS back then, so it had to have been a free something. White balance was set to flourescent lighting, otherwise everything was set to auto. This was shot in the abandoned Packard auto plant in Detroit, just before the sun set in mid January. While I know now that there are tons of flaws in that picture, it's one of the very few that everyone compliments me on, and that felt awesome being that I really had no clue what I was doing back then. eric -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
