>I just don't understand you. A couple of days ago Norm and I apologized >for contributing to the last outburst, and Tim strongly took your side of >that issue, and your response was "fuck you" in three separate posts, one >to Norm, one directed at me, and least understandable, one to Tim.
This is water under the bridge, but I just feel like making two things clear. My first "why do people fight over toys" message was adressed to everybody involved in the fight. It was intended as a neutral meta comment, from the sideline. But I did react on the socalled "poll" thread. That I found far over the top. I stated my opinoin in that specific issue. No more, no less. Back to harmless lurkin again. Tim Mostly harmless. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:33 PM Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh > Looks like I'm going to need tighter filtering, but, as long as I saw this > ... > > JCO, the thread has moved from your specific comment through the general > rendering of the 85mm lens bokeh to some general comments about bokeh. > It's no longer about YOUR specific comments. Threads and discussions on > the PDML, as well as other mail lists, tend to wander. > > Further, you are now making a personal attack by calling a contributor to > the thread "clueless." True, it's only a mild attack, but one that's > going > to leave you open to some negative comments and possibly start another > flame war, more than likely causing you to, once again, use abusive > language and post your messages using lots of upper case letters, and get > any number of people here to the point where they'll start responding in > kind, as which already seems to be the case. > > I just don't understand you. A couple of days ago Norm and I apologized > for contributing to the last outburst, and Tim strongly took your side of > that issue, and your response was "fuck you" in three separate posts, one > to Norm, one directed at me, and least understandable, one to Tim. > > Relax, chill out, enjoy your camera, or your DVD player, or your HDTV ... > vent your anger in other ways - go out and take a walk, get some exercise, > cut back on the sugar intake. LIGHTEN UP - not every comment is about > you > or directed to you. > > Kind regards, > > Shel > > > >> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >> From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Secondly, this WR guy's posts, really show >> > he is completely clueless. His deductions make >> > no sense because he either doesnt understand >> > or never noticed how unsharp mask works >> > or he doesnt read the posts in entirety because I clearly >> > stated that this bokeh problem is easily visible >> > in the viewfinder. Either or both ways its just plain >> > bad to be posting completely wrong stuff like that >> > based on lack of knowledge in the manner in which he posts it. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.5/769 - Release Date: 19.04.2007 > 17:56 > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
