What I'm saying is that I don't think your point valid as it may be, had 
much to do with the EU's original rational for prohibition of US beef.

Mark Roberts wrote:
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>   
>> Mark Roberts wrote:
>>     
>>> P. J. Alling wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> I wonder how much of that is real health concerns and how much is 
>>>> hidden protectionism.
>>>>         
>>> The issue is bacterial diseases building resistance to antibiotics 
>>> because of their overuse in livestock.
>>>
>>> Antibiotic-resistant diseases are a big problem and getting bigger.
>>>
>>>       
>> I think that's an issue after the fact.  Although I could be wrong 
>>     
> about 
>   
>> that. 
>>     
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by that, but the only way of addressing the 
> problem is to prohibit and/or discourage the routine use of antibiotics 
> in animal feed. You can do so by banning its use within your own 
> country and prohibiting importation of meat from countries that don't 
> ban it.
>
>
>   


-- 
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf 
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to