I wrote: > converted to 25-Megapixel file.
That's because the original conversion of my picture was intended for printing a 50x70cm photo, hence having the largest possible resolution could be useful. I just wanted to keep the same workflow for Stan's picture too. Dario ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 12:36 PM Subject: Re: Venice rooftops - comparison of DA12-24mm vs DA21mm > Picture by me (DA 12-24mm @ 12mm f/9): > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/Dario1653wm.jpg > > Picture by Stan (DA 21mm Limited f/7.1): > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/Stan2592wm.jpg > > Both processed with same parameters in PS CS2 (copied from previous > conversion, but with different CA compensation) to 16-bit, 25-Megapixel > files. Then added unsharp mask (amount 300, radius 0.8, threshold 0) and > then converted to 8 bit and downsized back to 10 Megapixel. > > Dario > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
