The Ds was much faster. I can't remember exactly what functions didn't work properly, (green button probably).
Paul Stenquist wrote: > I'm not peeved, but I want it for my studio. The Mac with two > monitors sits about ten feet from my usual camera position, and I've > already obtained a long USB cable. All that's missing is the > software. I've used the old version with the D, and it worked nicely > but it was quite slow, given both the D write speed and the USB 1 > connection. > Paul > On Apr 28, 2007, at 2:37 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > >> On Apr 27, 2007, at 8:11 PM, William Robb wrote: >> >> >>>> I saw that too. Presumably they were done with the Windows version >>>> and wanted to get it out for business reasons, but it's always a >>>> pain >>>> when companies don't do simultaneous releases. >>>> >>> At least for once you don't get to gloat about your Mac.... >>> (I'm trying to be funny) >>> >> When you have to use a disclaimer to explain you're "being >> funny" ... eh? ]'-) >> >> Seriously, if I were in need of tethered operation, I might be >> peeved. As it is, I have very little reason to use it so I'd rather >> they did a good job and release it when it's ready. >> >> G >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
