I say what I said before, any shots with this lens that dont show bad bokeh are just shots that dont reveal its bad bokeh. I can take photos all day long with it that dont reveal its bad bokeh, but I can also take some that do because it IS bad bokeh compared to most Pentax lenses when the the lens's bokeh is clearly ILLUSTRATED/revealed. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom C Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 9:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: M85mm f2.0 bokeh Indeed it does. All those bokehs look fine to me. :-) I would guess that John's bad bokeh is an anomaly of the particular circumstances and conditons when the shot was taken . Tom C. >From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: M85mm f2.0 bokeh >Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:10:28 -0600 > >I promised Tom C that I would try to do a bokeh comparison between the >A85/1.4, M85/2, FA77 and DA70 lenses. I had a few moments between >supper and getting bombed, so here goes: > >http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/m852bokeh/852bokeh.html > >I set up using the 85/1.4 with the intention of leaving the camera >stationary, and cropping the images from the shorter lenses. I felt it >best for comparative purposes if the camera: subject/background ratio >stayed the same. I didn't go to extremes regarding matching densities, >I used one of the 85/1.4 files as a reference and used the middle >levels slider to get them close. > >As I expected, the M85/2 stands up very well compared to the much >newer, >and >much more expensive glass. > >Enjoy > >William Robb > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
