Bruce wrote: > My concern is if you are going to do no better than the competition, and > they are more entrenched, how are you going to compete. The motto "We're no > worse than the rest" comes to mind.
Agreed. I guess all they want to do is have some offering, no matter what. > > A full frame CCD was, IMHO, one of the big differences between the Pentax > and a D30 or D1. Pentax may be able to sell a lesser model to some of us, > but it will *not* lure Canon and Nikon users away. You don't really gain > any market share. At best, you may hang on to what you have. But it seems > that you are sending the same old signal, "we will not compete." > Probably a dumb question, but I'll ask it anyway. I think I understand that a perceived advantage to using a full frame CCD was that the CCD captures the entire scene entering the camera thru the lens. Is this correct? It seems to me that the real issue is, do I like the results I get... does the captured scene match my vision through the viewfinder. Does the frame size really matter that much? Tom C. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
