Prefer the original. More imposing..(?) Jack --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was enough of a consensus that this was too dark. So here's > another try. I bumped up the mid tones then darkened the sky a bit. > > Then applied the B&W conversion, this time with a red filter. I > applied > a faux grain layer, (which I find works a bit like pre-flashing film, > > anyone else remember that technique?). Then added a Platinum tint. > > http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_deeprivertounoffices_b.html > > And the original in case anyone wants to compare. > > http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_deeprivertounoffices.html > > As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored. > > -- > Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw > uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
