[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think he means that with the switch to digital, the average photographer > has become more concerned with technical perfection. I believe that this is > generally true. With film, only those who did their own darkroom work had > absolute control. Now nearly all advanced photographers can take complete > control of their workflow. So they are more aware of faults and strive to > eliminate them. This transfers to the judging criteria as well. Probably a > good thing in many ways. > Paul
Good point but it's not what I was getting at. That's a whole new ball game of problems. > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>mike wilson wrote: >> >>>>From: Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> >>>>Overall - it was a pretty interesting experience. I always imagined >>>>judges looking at my photos like I look at them - pouring over them for >>>>a long time, looking at the nuance and detail. I should of put 2 + 2 >>>>together - when you consider the numbers of photos they are looking at, >>>>it's a pretty snap judgment process. And the slightest technical fault >>>>can get your image booted... >>> >>> >>>Your impressions coincide with my belief of the direction photography is >>>going >> >>since the advent of consumer digital equipment. It would be interesting to >>get >>the impression of someone who has been regularly judging during the >>changeover >>from chemical to digital. >> >>Not sure what you mean here. >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
