Lightroom's way of organising things is just right for me and yes it is a bit heavy on resources but not out of reach for most decently specd PCs.
I'm curious about C1's raw conversion quality. I guess I should really download the trial and give it a whirl. Regards Patrick On 4/30/07, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been a Capture One LE user for a couple of years and have used > Lightroom and also own Silkypix. > > The two areas of Lightroom that were problematic for me were - SPEED - > Lightroom is quite resource intensive and I found the overall speed to > not be to my liking. This is not to say that it was totally slow on > my system, but compared to alternatives, it is slow. > > The other area that I don't care for in Lightroom is the heavy handed > organization that is imposes. For many, this could be considered one > of it's best features. For me, who shoots lots of events, weddings > and portraits, it gets in the way. I have other programs that I use > for those duties including Breezebrowser and ExpressDigital's > Darkroom. > > So what I am saying is, if speed is not an issue for you, and you like > the organizational tools, then you would be hard pressed to find a > better tool. > > -- > Bruce > > > Monday, April 30, 2007, 3:28:26 AM, you wrote: > > PG> With the availability of Capture One for the K10D it would be > PG> interesting to see how it stacks up against the other options eg. ACR > PG> 3.7, ACR 4, SilkyPix and Lightroom. > > PG> I simply love the way lightroom works and would need a very compelling > PG> argument to ditch it but I may consider getting something like C1Pro > PG> for that extra bit of edge when you really need it. > > PG> What's the general opinion on C1Pro vs the others ? > > PG> -- > PG> Regards > > PG> Patrick Genovese > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Regards Patrick Genovese -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
