Nice composition, but not as unique as your earlier tree pic (the centered one). I think this might work better in color. The green foliage would provide an attractive backdrop for the tree trunks. The backlight works well, and you nailed the exposure. Paul On May 2, 2007, at 9:54 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> > On May 2, 2007, at 6:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/21a.htm >> >> I like those. Very nice. And I like them better than the other two >> (I think >> it has been) that you have shown recently. They do look over >> sharpened or >> something on my monitor. The white stuff on the closest tree. >> However, maybe in >> a larger shot that looks more natural. The whiteout in back, the >> fall off in >> detail, is just enough in the right places to be quite pleasing >> (can't figure >> out how to say it better). Very nice overall. > > Thanks Marnie. :-) > > Only Lightroom's default (about "25" on the scale, whatever that > means) was done on the full resolution image. The only sharpening > applied beyond that was what my resizing script usually does for > downsampled web images. > > The white bits on the tree's trunk are bits of white fungus/ > mushroom ... They're so stark white it looks like oversharpening but > isn't. They image nicely in the print, of course. I could soften them > a little bit with the blur tool in Photoshop but then they'll look > mushy... > > Godfrey > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
