Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is funny. After reading that, I wondered what kind of idiocy I was > spreading around Usenet back in the day, and I ran across a thread here:
Just found these two posted many moons ago by yours truly: +++++++ On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:00:15 -0500, "Lew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Are there any 220 backs for the Kiev 88? You're not happy with fogging 12 frames at a time? Ralf +++++++ On the Kiev 88: > What should I offer for these cameras, > assuming they are in good working order? With the 88, there's no such thing as good working order. They only ever survive the next frame by the skin of their badly machined teeth. ++++++++ Ralf -- Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005 Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6 mount lenses -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
