On 06/05/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure how I feel about this shot, but it might be a good one > for my nature center gallery. I passed it up the first time I > reviewed the day's shooting, but looked at it again today. It's not a > great bird pic, but it might be a nice nature center shot. What I > mean by that is that it shows the habitat and IDs the bird. People > who love the nature center (and it has some rabid fans) might like > something like this. By the way, an ID on the bird would be nice. > Save me pulling out my book. And we have so many people here who > really know birds. I can identify only a handful without a book. > Anyway, here he is: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5931913&size=lg
Technically this image doesn't appear to be up to your normal standards Paul, though it may do nicely for the purpose of identification or general illustration. In my honest opinion it appears to have a strange colour balance (it's not a simple cast), it also appears grainy, a little over-saturated and potentially slightly over-exposed (though obviously the subject of the image is not). -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
