And I appreciate your honest evaluation. Thanks. Paul On May 5, 2007, at 11:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 5/5/2007 9:07:51 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'm not sure how I feel about this shot, but it might be a good one > for my nature center gallery. I passed it up the first time I > reviewed the day's shooting, but looked at it again today. It's not a > great bird pic, but it might be a nice nature center shot. What I > mean by that is that it shows the habitat and IDs the bird. People > who love the nature center (and it has some rabid fans) might like > something like this. By the way, an ID on the bird would be nice. > Save me pulling out my book. And we have so many people here who > really know birds. I can identify only a handful without a book. > Anyway, here he is: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5931913&size=lg > > > ========== > Thumbs down. It's almost good enough, but not quite. > > Well, you asked. > > Marnie aka Doe :-) > > --------------------------------------------- > Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > > > > ************************************** See what's free at http:// > www.aol.com. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
