I wasn't speaking of the PUG. I think it's fine as is. I was talking about PESOs and having the option of viewing a larger size. You can always make an image smaller, but you can't make it larger. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Peso Squatter's Rights > > > > 600 pixels is too small. This is a photography list, and most viewers want > > to be able to judge image quality. Even at 1200 pixels that can be > > difficult. At 600 it's impossible. > > The 600 pixel constraint was put in when monitors were smaller, bandwidth > was expensive, lots of people were on dial-up, and dinosaurs still roamed > the earth. > I can happily view an image of 800 vertical pixels, providing there is no > page formatting above and below it on a 1280x960 monitor. > I hate scrolling pages though. > Consider that while this is a photography list, we don't all have or can > afford Cinema displays, nor are we willing to overdrive 19 inch monitors to > 1200x1600 pixels, since the quality turns to crap anyway. > While it may be time to relax the image size constraints, please don't turn > the PUG into a gallery by and for elitists with the latest equipment. > > William Robb > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
