What? Is Godfrey in a 3rd grade photography? :-) Sorry to appear rude. What is good about this picture? I don't find anything appealing about it. I don't see that it took any more effort than haphazardly raising the camera to one's eye and pressing the shutter release, maybe not even looking through the viewfinder.
Not only is the main subject not in clear focus, the secondary subject is not either, and both are cut off. I'm not a believer that some sort of unspoken social commentary, makes a photograph a good photograph. If this is the kind of image that constitutes an incredible photograph, then by God, every person that ever picked up a camera and pressed the shutter release a half dozen times is a good photographer, and we should all stop trying. Tom C. >On 08/05/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>I missed this as well. Beautifully captured. Very moving. >>Paul >>On May 7, 2007, at 5:50 PM, frank theriault wrote: >> >> > On 5/5/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/22.htm >> > >> > I missed this first time 'round. >> > >> > In incredible photograph. >> > >> > Just incredible... >> > >> > cheers, >> > frank >> > >> > -- >> > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson >> > >> > -- >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> > [email protected] >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
