Mark Roberts wrote: > > That's my policy, too. And I've found that many (not all) of the > negative comments I do see fall into the categories of > nit-picking-pixel-peeping or are over things like oversharpening that > apply only to the web image and not the eventual print (which is what I > always regard as the final product of a photograph). My observation is > that there seems to be a lot of scrutinizing trees while ignoring the > forest. > > That said, I have to admit that the appeal of this specific photograph > of Godfrey's completely escapes me. I just don't see anything there. > But that's just me. No photo has to please *everyone*. > > > > > My policy, too. If I do criticize a photo it's only if I feel that I can offer a constructive alternative. My own knowledge of photography is very limited compared to most list members, and I feel that it's best to let someone more qualified nit-pick. On the other hand, I really don't mind at all if someone calls one of my photographs "poop" and leaves it at that.
-- Scott Loveless www.twosixteen.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
