It seems pretty spectacular to me. Yes, I do like it, and yes I still hate you.
Tom C wrote: > Here's a photo I've been debating adding to my portfolio for a long time. > > It's not a knock-your-socks-off kind of image, but I find it appealing > nevertheless. I'm considering using it in a collection of greeting cards... > going with my "Unnoticed Idaho" theme. > > So what does the group think, and why? > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5720249&size=lg > > > Tom C. > > >>> I'm my own worst critic and a pretty ruthless one at that. My editing >>> is pretty harsh and goes something like this: "crap, crap, crap, crap, >>> meh, crap, WHAT WAS I DOING?, good, crap, crap, good, good, crap..." >>> what I consider crap, others may consider "good enough." For example, >>> if something isn't perfectly sharp where I want it to be perfectly >>> sharp, it doesn't get a second chance, regardless of the subject (unless >>> it is a super rare species and I won't get another chance to photograph >>> it). >>> >>> Christian >>> http://photography.skofteland.net >>> >>> >> Good man! That's exactly the same way it goes with me. >> >> The last mistake I made in this area was the "Falling Water" photo which >> some regular commenters had some issues with. It was the best of the 40 or >> so shots I had taken that morning and I let my excitement with being there >> and actually viewing the scene pollute my judgement about the resulting >> image. >> >> Tom C. >> >> > > > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
