Tom, I find it technically faultless & worthy of inclusion in a portfolio. Not outstanding, but a very good capture of a scenic area further enhanced by the snow & clouds. Certainly fits in an Unnoticed Theme.
Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Looking at Pictures and PESO > Here's a photo I've been debating adding to my portfolio for a long time. > > It's not a knock-your-socks-off kind of image, but I find it appealing > nevertheless. I'm considering using it in a collection of greeting > cards... > going with my "Unnoticed Idaho" theme. > > So what does the group think, and why? > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5720249&size=lg > > > Tom C. > >> >> > >> >I'm my own worst critic and a pretty ruthless one at that. My editing >> >is pretty harsh and goes something like this: "crap, crap, crap, crap, >> >meh, crap, WHAT WAS I DOING?, good, crap, crap, good, good, crap..." >> >what I consider crap, others may consider "good enough." For example, >> >if something isn't perfectly sharp where I want it to be perfectly >> >sharp, it doesn't get a second chance, regardless of the subject (unless >> >it is a super rare species and I won't get another chance to photograph >> >it). >> > >> >Christian >> >http://photography.skofteland.net >> > >> >>Good man! That's exactly the same way it goes with me. >> >>The last mistake I made in this area was the "Falling Water" photo which >>some regular commenters had some issues with. It was the best of the 40 >>or >>so shots I had taken that morning and I let my excitement with being there >>and actually viewing the scene pollute my judgement about the resulting >>image. >> >>Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
