In a message dated 5/9/2007 4:57:14 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe Pentax expected to exactly break even on the 645d and use it as a selling point, (loss leader), that's not necessarily bad business, but it wouldn't appeal to Sparx corporation. While I think that Pentax'd get better bang for the buck with the so called "K1D" with a larger sensor, (with or without an aperture simulator), using the 645d and breaking even isn't a bad idea, just not as high profit.
========= Yeah. Well, let's hope all these adjustments affect the bottom line enough that they satisfy Sparx and beat off a take over bid by Hoya. I am really not really sure how all this corporate stuff works, but it sure seems Pentax is trying to "hang tough" and remain a camera company. I admire their commitment. Marnie aka Doe :-) ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
