Logic tells us that when conditions change corporations change course. Tom C wrote: > Logic would tell us that Pentax could probably not produce a competitive, > profitable, MF DSLR in the face of many MF pro's dumping their MF film > bodies and going with the high-end MP Canon bodies over the last several > years. They were too far behind the curve, and technology and the > marketplace were moving too fast. > > But they announced it and began development. > > Logic would tell us that, having spent all the resources on said model, and > continuing to display it and proclaim it's forthcoming release, even of > late, that it would actually occur. > > But that appears otherwise. > > So what does logic tell us? > > > Tom C. > > > >> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Pentax - Selling HQ and Apparently Drops 645D >> Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:09:05 -0400 >> >> Logic, yes. Start from incorrect assumptions and follow them to the >> logical incorrect conclusion. Not that I'm saying Paul is wrong, just >> that even impeccable logic doesn't guarantee he's right. >> >> Jack Davis wrote: >> >>> Irrefutable logic! >>> >>> Jack >>> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Whatever size sensor Pentax uses in the K1D, we can be sure it will >>>> work with DA lenses. They wouldn't be introducing a full line of >>>> expensive lenses for cameras that can't use them. So FF is definitely >>>> a no go. >>>> Paul >>>> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >>>> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Digital Image Studio wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> But they just can't go on increasing the density of APS sized >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> sensor >>>> >>>> >>>>>> ad infinitum, it will only end in tears. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> It's true. If the K1D is 14 megapixels as reported, it'll certainly >>>>> >>>>> have to have a larger sensor than APS-C if they're going to meet >>>>> >>>>> >>>> users' >>>> >>>> >>>>> (ever-increasing) demands for low noise. (I would expect around a >>>>> >>>>> >>>> 1.3 >>>> >>>> >>>>> crop to keep it usable with current DA lenses.) >>>>> >>>>> Here's a sobering statistic I just read: >>>>> Even if Canon pushes the upcoming 1Ds-III up to 22 megapixels as >>>>> rumored it will still have *lower* pixel density (that is, larger >>>>> pixels) than the Nikon D2x does *now* at 12 megapixels. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> ____________________________________________________________________________________ >> >>> Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast >>> with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. >>> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf >> thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > >
-- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
