My point is that the advantage of a larger sensor is less noise and the ability to print at a larger size (more mpixels), so unless you need the clean high ISO I doubt that you can tell the difference between downsized images for the web coming from a FF camera and a APS-C camera, any extra resolution advantage is lost in the downsizing process, don't you think? Otherwise I don't understand why you want a FF size sensor? Maybe the difference that you are seen have to do with glass and postprocessing?
On 5/10/07, Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Fernando Terrazzino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here is an idea that I never tried, take a raw photo > > with the k10d, > > process as 10Mb, 6Mb and 2Mb. Downsize every jpeg to > > half the size of > > the 2Mb photo. See any difference? > > > No, I haven't done that either. But why would I? > Wouldn't that only show relative resolutions at > different quailities of the same sensor? I need to get > a hold of a camera with a different sensor and run it > through it's paces and see if I notice a difference. > > -Brendan > > > > > > > On 5/10/07, Brendan MacRae > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 10, 2007, at 3:01 AM, Brendan MacRae > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I talk to him all the time and he's really > > > > craving the > > > > > quality that he's seeing from guys on his > > Canon > > > > > forums. I've subscribed myself to one and have > > > > seen > > > > > some of this work and it blows me away. Much > > of it > > > > > looks like MF to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > Then you've seen prints. Because on the web MF > > work > > > > looks exactly > > > > like APS-C sensor work. They're all just itty > > bitty > > > > images. > > > > Paul > > > > > > All I can say is what I've seen on the web. To my > > eye > > > it appears vastly improved over what I see with > > the > > > smaller sensor cameras. It has a pop that just > > isn't > > > there with my stuff (inviting all now to simply > > say > > > it's my lousy photo skills vs. gear...<groan>). > > > > > > It's been enough to prompt me to see about renting > > one > > > to check it out for myself. > > > > > > -Brendan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > > Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. > > > Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. > > > > > > http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > [email protected] > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/ > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > TV dinner still cooling? > Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. > http://tv.yahoo.com/ > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
