I did follow the thread you refer to. Interesting reading.
I can assure you one thing. I have deleted a lot from that shooting ;-)
After that process I have a handful of shots I having troubles deciding. I'm 
still not sure.
The feedback is helpful, but not conclusive. And in the end the decition is 
mine.

Thank you for your honest opinion. Appreciated.

Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 2:05 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Heavy Weather 3


> Hi Tim,
>
> My view of all three shots are that they're somewhat interesting because 
> of
> the weather.  I did not find any of them to be good images, in either the
> photographic or art sense.
>
> If you really like these birds as a subject, I would suggest studying the
> images, taking into account the critical feedback received, and returning 
> to
> work the subject again at a future time.
>
> With wildlife and bird shots, having the subjects in sharp, crisp focus is 
> a
> prerequisite, and none of these were.
>
> A parallel thread that's been going on is the need to critically examine 
> and
> edit one's images. I sense that while seeing these birds first hand in 
> those
> condtions was exciting, that the images lack what you really were hoping 
> to
> capture.
>
> I don't think it works standalone and I would not use it as part of a
> series.
>
> Sincerely and friendly-like,
>
> Tom C.
>
>>From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>>Subject: Re: PESO - Heavy Weather 3
>>Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 19:34:10 -0400
>>
>>It would have more impact on me if the foreground birds weren't merging
>>into
>>the black rocks.
>>
>>Thumbsdown.
>>
>>Kenneth Waller
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: PESO - Heavy Weather 3
>>
>>
>> > One more. Less subtile this time. From a technical point of view this 
>> > is
>> > better, but IMO this has less impact.
>> > http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=309366
>> >
>> > Whatdoyoathink? As stand alone, and as part of the series?
>> >
>> > Tim Typo
>> > Mostly Harmless
>>
>>
>>--
>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>[email protected]
>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/797 - Release Date: 10.05.2007 
17:10


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to