Hi! > A couple of other people have mentioned the legs.
As well they might. > I agree that they'd be better off gone, and indeed, they weren't in > the viewfinder (I checked very carefully after chimping the first > couple, seeing them there). I guess those viewfinders don't quite > cover the whole frame. Yes of course. I think it is 95% coverage or something. > That being said, (a) I don't crop and (b) I like where Chalkman is in > the frame and cropping would change that and (c) cloning is right out. You're not being original, Mister Knarf ;-). Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
