I would say no. The dynamic is lost, and the dresses are oddly distorted. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Paul Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I did a little finagling (that's a technical term, btw) with the skew > tool. Does this make a more comfortable view? > > http://home.earthlink.net/~allaround6/quickpage/quickpage.htm > > -p > > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > On May 14, 2007, at 9:24 AM, frank theriault wrote: > > > >>>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5965027 > >>> ... The tilt is a little overmuch for me. I really want to rotate it > >>> about 5 degrees clockwise. ... > >> ... I must comment on the tilt issue, however, as it's been > >> mentioned by a > >> couple of you. > >> > >> I don't find that it's tilted! Is it me? Do I have a tilted brain? > >> A tilted face? > >> > >> In all seriousness, I know that some vertical lines are tilted, but in > >> the viewfinder I was looking at the subject and the mannequins: they > >> look upright and vertical to me. ... > > > > I grabbed a copy and did some twisting about with it. 5 degrees is > > too much. It is tricky, but I have the sensation of her falling > > backwards in a subtle way and the window/mannikins falling forwards. > > I find it looks right when I rotate it clockwise by about 2 > > degrees ... the left edge of the "Feminine" sign is straight in line > > with the woman's right heel and the reflection of the curb in the > > window is level. All other lines are slightly at angle due to > > keystoning and your eyepoint. > > > > I think you were on the bicycle when you shot it, your eyepoint seems > > about 6" or so higher than normal. > > > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
