[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 10/24/2001 8:32:56 AM US Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > On Tuesday, October 23, 2001, at 03:24 PM, Ryan Charron wrote: > > > > > > > It just does, that's all there is to it! > > > > > > > > No Canon or Nikon even comes close. > > > > > > While I agree about the 645n's superiority over every device made by > > > Canon and Nikon, I must respectfully voice the opinion that THE PENTAX > > > 67 KICKS ITS ASS. > > > > The 67 is too fat and slow to catch a 645n in order to kick it's ass... > > > > tv > > > > ...more like rec.photo.35mm every day...
Shut up! BTW, what's the best film for taking pictures of various things? tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
