I agree the 67 is slow and fat, especially with a 300mm F4 ( or Aaron ) stuck to it, but if it did catch a 645n or any other camera for that matter it would definitly kick A$$ :)
--- tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aaron Reynolds wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, October 23, 2001, at 03:24 PM, Ryan > Charron wrote: > > > > > It just does, that's all there is to it! > > > > > > No Canon or Nikon even comes close. > > > > While I agree about the 645n's superiority over > every device made by > > Canon and Nikon, I must respectfully voice the > opinion that THE PENTAX > > 67 KICKS ITS ASS. > > The 67 is too fat and slow to catch a 645n in order > to kick it's ass... > > tv > - Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
