True for the most part. And  working with their photo desk, I get the 
impression that it's highly disorganized. 
Paul
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The New York Times considers itself above reproach.  I would think they 
> would no more stoop to covering their arse than admitting they were 
> wrong in the first place.  The fact that they've been caught with their 
> pants down around their ankles a number of cases not withstanding...
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On the few occassions I've shot for the NY Times, they've asked only for 
> hi-res jpegs. I shot RAW, but they never requested the original files. 
> However, 
> none of these were for what you would call "hard news" stories.
> > Paul
> >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >   
> >> William Robb wrote:
> >>
> >>     
> >>> The pro guys I deal with are mostly shooting jpg. The exceptions are 
> >>>       
> >> when 
> >>     
> >>> they feel the need for the extra WB control, although even then, they 
> >>>       
> >> aren't 
> >>     
> >>> doing much beyond using the default conversion to jpg.
> >>>       
> >> Is this mostly in a studio environment? JPEG makes sens there because 
> >> lighting and exposure are controlled. All the wedding pros I know 
> >> personally shoot Raw because of the constantly changing lighting.
> >>
> >> And many PJ photographers are required by their employers to shoot Raw 
> >> now, so that they have a verifiable "original" in case allegations of 
> >> image manipulation come up. When Patrick Schneider spoke at the GFM 
> >> Camera Clinic (the late summer PJ event) in the midst of his image 
> >> alteration controversy a few years ago, he revealed that the Charlotte 
> >> Observer has *always* required its photographers to shoot Raw. The 
> >> paper keeps a permanent archive of all its photographers' Raw files 
> >> just in case questions about a photo's authenticity arise later. Given 
> >> the various scandals that have arisen since then, I'd be amazed if most 
> >> major papers didn't have very similar policies.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>     
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> -- 
> All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to