No a yawn is appropriate, because it's a conversation based on misinformation. Let's wait until we have some real information. Then we can wring our hands, bail, or do whatever is appropriate. But why speculate based on what is apparently partial truths mixed with a lot of BS. Paul On May 20, 2007, at 10:00 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 21/05/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm just tired of all those who spend so much time watching the sky >> to see if it's falling. If I were inclined to dump my Pentax gear, I >> would do it now. But I'm not going to. It works quite well, thank >> you. A yawn is appropriate. > > It's not really, this is a conversation about Pentax on a Pentax > discussion list. Try to exercise just a little empathy, granted > Pentax's future is not entirely clear at the moment. However consider > for just a moment that some others here may not be made of money and > may have had to save and sacrifice to buy into the Pentax system and > as such are simply concerned that it may not have a future. Surely > scenarios are worth discussion. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
