My opinion is it's all FUD, being spread by Sparx, to cause Pentax 
investors who might support the current board pause and Pentax customers 
to delay purchases until the situation plays out, thus putting more 
pressure on Pentax.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 5/20/2007 2:56:28 P.M.  Pacific Daylight Time, 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Thanks Marnie, but the  poster refer to a 'Nikkei report', not to the one 
> linked.
> "
> The Nikkei  report include a few more details than the FT report: "
>
> Do you also refer  to this Nikkei report?
>
> I am afraid I am too lazy to read all those  financial articles. English is 
> not my first language and an automatic English  translation from a Japanese 
> financial article may be absolutely cryptic for me  ;-)
> ...however, after reading the reactions to this post in the same thread,  I 
> believed that it was  accurate.
>
> Regards,
> Jaume
>
>
> ==========
> New news  article:
> http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2c7cca36-04dd-11dc-80ed-000b5df10621.html
>
> And  I just posted, what was it, two days ago? Another, day earlier, article 
> that  Hoya was going to keep the camera division and Pentax would become a 
> subsidiary  of Hoya.
>
> This story has been reported, over time, so many different ways  that I 
> question the veracity of any of them at this point. And Nikkei is the one  
> that 
> said they were going to sell their HQ. Except that when Pentax released  
> their 
> financial report that wasn't in it at all. So they were dead wrong on  that.
>
> It seems whoever is reporting the story, reporter, paper, inserts  their own 
> slant. First Hoya is going to merge with Pentax and axe the camera  division. 
> Then Pentax is going to sell HQ (and maybe buy more stock). Then the  CEO is 
> ousted, all kinds of reasons given for that one. Some articles imply the  
> reason the board drew out of the merger was to protect the camera division. 
> Then  
> other articles imply they withdrew to protect their jobs (in the merger deal  
> they would have lost them), with no mention of the camera division at  all.
>
> I recommend you also read the article in the thread I started, "Hoya  Agrees 
> to Keep Camera Division".
>
> With some much misinformation floating  around, things reportedly very 
> differently by different papers, it is really  hard to tell what is going on. 
> I just 
> know about 1/2 of them have been  inaccurate 1/4 - 1/2 of the time so far. As 
> far as we can tell. (Another example  - People were being reshuffled from one 
> building to another, cutting management,  etc.)
>
> So, personally, I feel it is too soon to be an alarmist.  
>
> Now, after May 24th, maybe you can be then. ;-)
>
> Marnie aka Doe  
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Warning: I am now  filtering my email, so you may be censored.  
>
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
>
>   


-- 
All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to