Shel wrote:
> What I read is that the proposed system will be using electron beams,
> so perhaps we're making some headway in finding out if the system
> will damage film or not.  Any further comments by those in the know
> about these things?

I heard this as well on NPR yesterday on the way home from work.  They
didn't say anything about the typical electron current or electron energy of
these electron guns.  They ~did~ say, as many on the list have already
noted, that the penetration depth isn't very large, so that letters would
likely have to be laid flat for this to do any good.  One thing energetic
electrons are very good at doing is ionizing things, so it may be that at
least part of the bactericidal action is due to localized generation of
nasty oxidizing agents like ionized molecular and atomic oxygen, ionized
nitrogen, etc.  Another thing energetic electrons are good at doing is
knocking core electrons out of metal atoms, resulting in X-ray emission.  In
fact, this is exactly how an X-ray tube is constructed -- an electron beam
of several kilovolts to a few tens of kilovolts impinges on a metal target,
like copper.  Could be that the damage to film would arise due to X-ray
emission from electron bombardment of the metal cassettes and metal spools
used in packaging roll film.  I also heard the same NPR commentator make
remarks regarding use of gamma irradiation facilities for mail.  Current
facilities in the US are used for sterilization of foods and medical
devices, and they apparently would not accept mail for gamma sterilization.
A new gamma irradiation facility might cost somewhere in the neighborhood of
several million USD and take up to a year to build.  IIRC, the commentator
stated that several hundred such facilities would be needed to irradiate all
mail in the US.  Thus, widespread use of gamma sounds like it will not be
feasible.

God help the poor SOB who ships a fungus-infected lens.  Imagine the
consequences if some postal employee -- or FBI agent, Secret Service agent,
INS agent, etc., etc. -- recognize the fungus as "some unidentified
biological agent".  Yikes!

Bill Peifer
Rochester, NY
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to