SMC FA 20-35mm f4.0, if you give it the 5& slop factor at both ends allowed by lax standards you get 19-36.75 close enough I would wager.
William Robb wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" > Subject: Re: Sigma 300/2.8 DG for Pentax > > > On 13.06.2007, at 08:19 , William Robb wrote: > > >> The >> 12-24mm zoom is huge >> > 12-24 for FF would be even bigger. Look at Sigma 12-24 - it is bigger > (87 mm x 102.5 mm vs. 84 mm × 87.5 mm) and havier (600 g vs. 430 g) > than DA 12-24/4. And Sigma is f4.5-5.6 lens, not fixed f4 like > Pentax. Oh and you can't use front filters in Sigma ;-) > > > You forget that to get the same AOV on full frame you wouldn't need a 12-24, > but something in the range of an 18-36. The original istD kit lens (18-35) > was close to full frame coverage, and while large, wasn't anywhere near as > massive as the 12-24. > > William Robb > > > -- All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
