Juan J. Buhler writes: > About the page itself, I think simple is good. I could live without the > inscriptions around each image, and maybe replace the double frame with a > single one, black or dark grey.
I'll see what I can do :) I put the filmstrip bits there because I thought they'd look interesting (they're just static gif files so the numbers don't signify anything). It took a sh*tload of work in Photoshop to generate one for each film type, in each format, and portrait/landscape orientation. And I've only done the slide films I use so far :) Before I do more of them I'll fiddle with the layout a bit. I'll save myself lots of work (while having wasted lots more) if I get rid of them. > Nice clean and commented HTML, BTW. Are you writing your own scripts to > generate it? Sort-of. I'm working on keeping all the picture info in a database which reads a relatively-intelligent scripted HTML file and spits out the page with all the info on it, including a link to the image file. In this case I decided to use static pages to save pasting massive URLs together. So I stuffed all the relevant details into my development/test database, then did a lookup, clicked "view page souce" on the result, pasted the whole lot into a new file and hand-massaged it to remove a few irrelevant bits and make it all work from a single directory. It sounds like lots of work but hand-writing the pages from scratch would have taken longer. Cheers, - Dave David A. Mann, B.E. (Elec) http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ "Why is it that if an adult behaves like a child they lock him up, while children are allowed to run free on the streets?" -- Garfield - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
