I didn't actually say that, but I did imply a consensus had been formed (as 
if that means anything) - and I was wrong. As has been the debate over many 
years, swinging two and fro, it's apparently headed back to separate 
species.

Regards,
Bob Blakely
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A mother takes twenty years to make a man of her boy,
and another woman makes a fool of him in twenty minutes."
 - Robert Frost

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: Global warming was: The Nine-spotted


> The one that says there is now only one theory.
>
> -- 
> graywolf
> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
> -----------------------------------
>
>
> Bob W wrote:
>> Which Bob?
>>
>> --
>>  Bob
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf Of graywolf
>>> Sent: 14 June 2007 01:02
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: Re: Global warming was: The Nine-spotted
>>>
>>> Even as simple a search as Wikopedia shows that all this is
>>> still very much in dispute. The final argument seems to be
>>> that one side claims there was interbreeding and the other
>>> side says that was impossible because of DNA evidence, to
>>> which the other replies the samples were inadequate to prove
>>> anything. If you have something more definitive, I would like
>>> to know the source, Bob.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> graywolf
>>> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
>>> http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
>>> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
>>> -----------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> Bob Blakely wrote:
>>>> You're right. It's out of date.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Bob Blakely
>>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -------------------------------
>>>> "A mother takes twenty years to make a man of her boy,
>>>> and another woman makes a fool of him in twenty minutes."
>>>>  - Robert Frost
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The most recent book I have about Neandertals is dated
>>> 1999, so it's
>>>>> too early for some of the most recent findings, but right at the
>>>>> beginning it makes it quite clear that the classification
>>> is disputed
>>>>> (H. sapiens neanderthalensis or H. neanderthalensis).
>>>>>
>>>>> The Natural History Museum classifies them as Homo
>>> neanderthalensis,
>>>>> as does the American Museum of Natural History.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.nhm.ac.uk/about-us/news/2006/november/news_10013.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent/humanorigins/history/neander
>>>>> thals2.php
>>>>>
>>>>> Most of the recent genetic evidence seems to show that
>>> they were not a
>>>>> subspecies of H. sapiens, but a distinct species.
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FYI, Neanderthals are currently classified as homo sapiens.
>>>>>> You have to
>>>>>> reference outdated texts to find them classified as Homo
>>>>>> Neanderthalis (sp).
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to