Sorry I missed the print. I would have loved to see it on that Hannemuehl Fine Art Pearl. I used to use Hannemuehl William Turner Rag. It was beautiful, but it chipped too easily.
I can't say for certain if the K10D has improved my BW rendering because I also upgraded to the Epson 2400 at about the same time I bought the K10D. But I am very happy with my recent BW prints. Most often I'm using Epson Velvet Fine Art paper and the ICC Best Photo profile that Epson recently released. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Nicely rendered. Really works for me now. > > Thanks Paul. If you'd made it to GFM you could have seen the print. In > Hahnemuehl Fine Art Pearl it looks quite remarkable. I'm really > starting to develop a workflow for digital B&W. > > BTW: Is it just me or does the K10D seem to produce images better for > B&W conversion than the 6-megapixel cameras? Though I've certainly put > a lot of effort into learning digital B&W, I can't help but feel that > the extra pixels and new generation camera firmware are contributing. > > >> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
