The scans are saved in TIFF or PSD format, which I then converted to JPEG for the web.
In what way(s) is XAT better than other methods? Doug Franklin wrote: > > The size may be the result of how I saved the picture to a JPEG. In > > Photoshop there's a way to define the quality, and I chose medium, which > > yielded a file of a smaller size than high quality. Perhaps for the web > > I can get by with a lower setting, which may yield a smaller file size, > > although still with 600x400 dimensions. I'll try it and see what > > happens. > > Go to http://www.xat.com and get an evaluation copy of their XAT Image > Optimizer. Then, save your scans as BMP or TIFF or PNG or some other > lossless compression format, and let XAT convert the images to JPEG. > It does a much better job than the "Save as JPEG" option of any program > I've tried, including PhotoShop 6. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
