Vic,
The A mode on the lens makes an electrical contact for the body. When
A mode is set, the lens will stop down to f22 - unless the camera
tells it to stop at f4 or f8 or f16 or f2.  If your camera is stopping
down a bit early, check the mechanical parts as they could be a bit
bent.  Otherwise, run the aperture control lever (resistor) on the
camera body back and forth a number of times to improve the contact.
Regards, Bob S.

On 6/16/07, Vic Mortelmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so I fixed the major problem, but it seems that I still have the
> other problem that I detected when examining the first. In A-mode, the
> lens diaphragma is a bit smaller (about one stop, I guess) then what the
> camera says.
>
> No big deal, but I'd like to understand what's going on. This looks more
> like a mechanical problem that won't be solved by CLA? Any ideas?
>
> How does the A-mode work? I imagine it's like this:
>
> - inside the camera body, I see a litter lever that engages the
> diaphragma control lever on the lens.
>
> - when in M-mode, the lever in the camera body just moves all the way up
> (releases the diaphragma to close, but the lens mechanics will stop it
> at the f-stop selected on the lens); after exposure, the lever in the
> camera body moves down again, and pulls the lens diaphgragma open
>
> - when in A-mode, the lens allows the diapragma to be operated
> completely by the lever, so it's the camera that controls how far the
> lever is moved upwards, and thus how much the diaphragma is allowed to
> close.
>
> Reasoning like this, I'd rather expect the cause of the problem to lie
> within the camera... Can anyone second that?
>
> Groeten,
> Vic
>
> Vic Mortelmans schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this was easy!!
> >
> > I went to a shop that does camera maintenance, and they estimated 75
> > euro for the job --- more than the lens is worth. So I was lucky: a good
> > reason to take a look at the inside of the lens without the risk of
> > destroying value.
> >
> > There was nothing wrong with the blades (as I expected, because oil on
> > the blades should be visible, shouldn't it?), but there was oil in the
> > mechanism. See the picture here:
> >
> > http://picasaweb.google.be/vicmortelmans/Tech/photo#5076727091233563442
> >
> > It shows the back of the lens with the mount removed (only five screws
> > and one loose ring, no tiny bits jumping allover the room). The red line
> > indicates the two sliding parts that had oil inbetween them. Applied
> > some aceton and now the diaphragma closes as snappy as it can get.
> >
> > Groeten,
> >
> > Vic
> >
> >
> > Vic Mortelmans schreef:
> >> Hi Mat,
> >>
> >> You're right. The blades are not 'snapping' together when releasing
> >> the switch. I compared to my SMC M 28 f:2.8, which behaves a lot more
> >> 'snappy'.
> >>
> >> I never sent a lens out for CLA... what would be a reasonable price
> >> for this job? Any chance of trying this myself?
> >>
> >> Groeten,
> >>
> >> Vic
> >>
> >>
> >> Mat Maessen schreef:
> >>> On 6/15/07, Vic Mortelmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>> The shots on part 2 are all overexposed...
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't use program mode that often (mostly aperture priority), so
> >>>> could
> >>>> it be that this mode is malfunctioning? The diaphragma control by the
> >>>> camera is certainly doing something; I did a quick test in shutter
> >>>> priority mode and saw the diaphragma change when selecting different
> >>>> shutter speeds.
> >>>
> >>> Most probably, your A50/2 need a CLA. The diaphragm blades are most
> >>> likely not closing down quickly enough.  You can test this manually,
> >>> by looking through the back of the lens, and toggling the aperture
> >>> lever manually with your finger. The aperture blades should snap
> >>> closed when you release the lever, and you shouldn't feel any
> >>> stiffness or resistance in the lever motion (set the lens to f22 or A
> >>> for this test).
> >>>
> >>> -Mat
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to