She might have liked the darker color of the before pic <grin>. We are used to buildings looking like that when we are so close we have to tilt our head way back to see it. From father away we expect the building to look straight. Pschologically, I have found that a partial correction often looks best. Anyway, the technique is useful and you have added it to your arsenel of capabilities.
Your webpage will undoubtedly prove useful to many. It is nice to see folk trying to help others improve their images. --graywolf ----- Original Message ----- From: Peter Spiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 7:41 PM Subject: Perspective correction with PhotoDeluxe Maybe everybody else already knows this, but I just recently discovered a very useful feature in the cheap software that comes bundled with most scanners and digital cameras. I've written up how to do it, along with "before" and "after" pictures. (Of course, after I proudly showed my wife what I had achieved, she declared that she likes the "before" picture better. Maybe I picked a bad example of a building that looks better when it is leanding over backwards.) http://ca.geocities.com/spirope/perspective.htm ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
