Lookin' at the V700.... 'good enough, ain't good enough'. Norm Tom C wrote: > Are you going to settle for 'good enough' Norm? :-) > > Tom C. > > > >> From: Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Scanning med format >> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:54:58 -0400 >> >> Cool. Thanks guys... >> Norm >> >> Adam Maas wrote: >> >>> I concur. I use an Epson 4490, which is much cheaper ($250ish) but >>> >> delivers merely acceptable quality. The V700 is one of the best solutions >> short of a Nikon 8000 or 9000 dedicated film scanner. >> >>> -Adam >>> >>> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >>> >>> >>>> At an affordable price (about $475), the Epson V700 does a terrific >>>> >> job. >> >>>> Godfrey >>>> >>>> On Jun 27, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Norm Baugher wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Speaking of which, can someone recommend a decent scanner for B&W >>>>> 6x7 negs? >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
